I came to this novel a bit by chance: in the large section devoted to the author at a neighbourhood library I recently discovered while walking with my little one.
Pérez-Reverte was my favorite writer during my teenage years.
I drifted away from him at the umpteenth Alatriste instalment, a saga I’ve always considered minor compared with his “serious” novels.
The thing is, last year, during the long stretches of reading that came with the difficult pregnancy we went through, I came back to him.
And down they came, one after another:
- Sidi.
- The (then) Falcó trilogy.
- Line of Fire.
And I don’t remember whether there were any others.
I got hooked on his work again and, seeing the selection the library had, I chose The Final Problem.
Pérez-Reverte paying homage to my beloved Sherlock Holmes promised to be unbeatable.
It wasn’t.
But the next novel I borrowed from the library —this one— absolutely was.
A great choice.
I’ll tell you why.
Índice de Contenidos del Artículo
- What the novel is about
- What I liked
- What didn’t thrill me
- Conclusion
- Technical sheet
- Frequently asked questions
- What is What We Become about?
- Is it a romance novel?
- Is it better than The Final Problem?
- Is it one of Pérez-Reverte’s best novels?
- Is it similar to the Falcó saga or to Alatriste?
- Is it an action novel?
- Is it recommended if I have never read Pérez-Reverte?
- Is it a difficult novel to read?
- What role does chess play in the novel?
- Is What We Become worth reading?
What the novel is about
Well, it’s hard to explain without spoilers, but let’s try.
Let’s say two timelines overlap with the same protagonists. And the sections of each chapter alternate between one and the other.
It begins in the present, where Max —the male lead, whose point of view the book follows— is already older when, to his surprise, he sees Mecha one day, an old acquaintance and the book’s female lead.
From there, the present timeline unfolds through memories, things that might have been and were not, and chess games that will decide the world champion.
Interwoven with that, the past timeline tells how Max and Mecha met, how they parted ways and how they met again a few years later.
It is here, amid drinks, luxury and dancing, that the weight of time is seen by contrast, along with the different views of life we have in youth, in full maturity and in near-old age.
As you can see, I’m not telling you much. Basically because I don’t want to spoil a single thing. I want you to enjoy the endings of each chapter as much as I did.
That said, don’t think this is a relationship story where events are secondary.
Not at all.
There is action here. And events of varying importance keep unfolding without pause.
But I want you to discover them yourself.
What I liked
Everything.
The pace.
The dialogue.
The depth of the characters.
The situations.
The endings of each chapter.
The descriptions, which place you right in the middle of each setting. And make you want to visit them more than any Instagram reel.
Even the introductions to the history of tango and, to a lesser extent, the chess notes.
I would say the most remarkable thing is the fusion of many themes in the work, where each ingredient (love, luxury, dance, chess, places, characters, social differences, desires, ambitions…) is added in exactly the right measure.
Everything is in its place. That makes the book grab you and keeps you from wanting to stop reading.
It had been a long time since a book grabbed me like this.
What didn’t thrill me
Perhaps that there is something in the protagonists that I have already seen in other books by the Cartagena-born writer.
He is very handsome.
Like Falcó.
Like Father Quart (from The Seville Communion)).
Like the Italian.
And he handles difficult situations well.
Like Falcó.
Like Captain Alatriste.
Like the Italian.
And we could say much the same about Mecha, since there are facets of her that will remind us of one or another protagonist from some earlier work of his.
It is clear that the writer has an archetype of protagonists that, to a greater or lesser extent, most of his main characters share.
And yet, in this book Pérez-Reverte manages to give Max and Mecha a different finish. A deeper, more complex layer than usual.
In a way it surprised me. Because I did not expect it, and it is not necessary for the book to work as it does. But it adds something—boy, does it add something. And it contrasts with The Final Problem.
Conclusion
I loved it. It gave me the same feelings as his best books. And that is not easy, because there are not that many works that manage it.
It reminds me why I love reading so much, something the books by John le Carré and by Kafka that I have read lately have not managed to do. Not even close.
The Cartagena-born writer said he considered it his best work.
I wouldn’t go that far, but I would say it is among his best.
Considering that he is an author who has written more than 30 books and does not have a bad one, that should give you an idea of the level.
Besides, I want to add one nuance.
These latest works by Pérez-Reverte that I am reading seem to have been written by an author more mature. More seasoned (still). Calmer.
It is no longer all energy and the willpower of the protagonists.
There is more.
And this more measured style is reflected in his writing. Better still: it fits my current self in the same way the earlier style fit my adolescence.
So, if you like the style of his novels even a little —certainly far removed from his opinion columns— you’ll have a great time.
I don’t have much more to add. Well, yes: I’m off to check whether Tough Dogs Don’t Dance is as good as this one.
I’ll tell you.
Technical sheet
| Field | Data |
|---|---|
| Title | What We Become |
| Author | Arturo Pérez-Reverte |
| Original publisher | Alfaguara |
| Paperback edition publisher | Debolsillo |
| Original publication year | 2012 |
| Original publication date | November 21, 2012 |
| Debolsillo edition date | May 2015 / May 7, 2015 |
| Pages | 504 in the Alfaguara edition / 496 in the Debolsillo edition |
| Format | Paperback in Alfaguara / mass-market paperback in Debolsillo |
| Collection | Alfaguara / Best Seller in Debolsillo |
| Original language | Spanish |
| Country | Spain |
| Genre | Contemporary literature, historical novel, romance, intrigue, adventure |
| Main characters | Max Costa, Mecha Inzunza |
| Setting | Buenos Aires in 1928, Nice during the years of the Spanish Civil War and Sorrento in the 1960s |
| Main themes | Love, memory, desire, ambition, the passage of time, tango, chess, espionage |
| ISBN Alfaguara edition | 9788420413099 |
| ISBN Debolsillo edition | 9788490626580 |
| Premise | Max Costa and Mecha Inzunza meet again over several decades in a story of love, intrigue and decisions shaped by time. |
Rating
Who it is for
✔️ Pérez-Reverte followers. Hard for it to disappoint you.✔️ Anyone looking for a nimble, well-written and easy-to-read novel.
✔️ Readers looking for characters a little more complex than usual in commercial fiction.
Who it is not for
❌ Anyone looking for something more transcendent than a commercial novel.❌ Readers tired of Pérez-Reverte or who do not like his style. Even so, it deserves a chance.
Frequently asked questions
What is What We Become about?
The novel alternates two timelines with the same protagonists, Max and Mecha. It combines love, ambition, memory, chess and the passage of time in different twentieth-century European settings.
Is it a romance novel?
Not exactly. There is a central love story, but it is not a conventional romance novel. It is more a reflection on time, decisions and second chances, with tension, luxury and historical context.
Is it better than The Final Problem?
In my opinion, yes. It has more emotional depth and more complex characters. While The Final Problem works as a tribute, this novel has more identity of its own.
Is it one of Pérez-Reverte’s best novels?
For many readers it is in their top 3, especially for those who prefer the more mature and reflective Pérez-Reverte to the more adventurous one.
Is it similar to the Falcó saga or to Alatriste?
It shares the author’s classic archetype: a charismatic, elegant and resourceful protagonist. However, here the characters have greater psychological depth and emotional development.
Is it an action novel?
It has action and narrative tension, but it is not a frantic novel. The rhythm is elegant and restrained, with more weight on atmosphere and dialogue than on pure action.
Is it recommended if I have never read Pérez-Reverte?
Yes. It can be a very good entry point if you’re looking for a more introspective novel, less focused on war or historical spectacle.
Is it a difficult novel to read?
No. The style is fluid and engrossing. Although there are references to tango and chess, you do not need prior knowledge to enjoy it.
What role does chess play in the novel?
More than a decorative element, chess works as a metaphor for time, strategy and the protagonists’ life decisions.
Is What We Become worth reading?
If you are interested in an elegant, well-constructed story with complex characters, especially if you connect with the idea of the passage of time and maturity, then yes, it is worth it.

Leave a Reply